Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HDFS, mail # dev - VOTE: HDFS-347 merge


Copy link to this message
-
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge
Colin McCabe 2013-04-08, 22:53
Let's extend this vote by another 2 days just in case Nicholas doesn't find
time in his schedule today to comment.

He needs to withdraw his -1 before we can proceed.

Colin
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1 for the branch merge. I've reviewed all of the code in the branch, and
> we have people now running this code in production scenarios. It is as
> functional as the old version and way easier to set up/configure.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Colin McCabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think it's time to merge the HDFS-347 branch back to trunk.  It's been
> > under
> > review and testing for several months, and provides both a performance
> > advantage, and the ability to use short-circuit local reads without
> > compromising system security.
> >
> > Previously, we tried to merge this and the objection was brought up that
> we
> > should keep the old, insecure short-circuit local reads around so that
> > platforms for which secure SCR had not yet been implemented could use it
> > (e.g. Windows).  This has been addressed-- see HDFS-4538 for details.
> >  Suresh has also volunteered to maintain the insecure SCR code until
> secure
> > SCR can be implemented for Windows.
> >
> > Please cast your vote by EOD Monday 4/8.
> >
> > best,
> > Colin
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>