Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Re: [DISCUSSION] Sorting out issues for 0.96 for (eventual) release


+
Devaraj Das 2013-02-06, 21:53
+
Stack 2013-02-06, 22:29
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-06, 23:11
+
Stack 2013-02-06, 23:26
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-06, 23:29
+
Nicolas Liochon 2013-02-07, 08:41
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Sorting out issues for 0.96 for (eventual) release
No feedback on whether February 15th is ok to branch?  Lets say 22nd then.
 If no complaint, will put it up as branch day.

Thanks all,
St.Ack
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1 for the maven style snapshots: at the beginning, we can create them
> without branching.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good to me, and you're the RM anyway. :-)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > However, we could branch and start releasing 0.95.<date> developer
> > > preview
> > > > releases pretty soon, right?, to start testing the relative stability
> > as
> > > > these things land.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Rather than 0.95, I was thinking we could just do maven-style snapshot
> > > releases: i.e. 0.96.0.MAVEN_SUPPLIED_DATE
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-06, 22:11
+
Stack 2013-02-06, 22:52