Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HDFS >> mail # dev >> [Discuss] Merge federation branch HDFS-1052 into trunk


+
Suresh Srinivas 2011-04-22, 16:48
+
Dhruba Borthakur 2011-04-23, 08:08
+
Doug Cutting 2011-04-25, 21:36
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-26, 17:29
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-26, 23:06
+
Doug Cutting 2011-04-27, 04:43
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2011-04-27, 05:26
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-27, 06:34
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-27, 06:55
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-27, 17:02
+
Tsz Wo \ 2011-04-27, 17:08
+
Devaraj Das 2011-04-27, 17:08
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-04-27, 17:41
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-27, 21:36
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2011-04-28, 05:18
+
Hairong 2011-04-27, 17:46
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2011-04-28, 04:56
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-04-28, 13:36
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-28, 18:02
+
Owen OMalley 2011-04-27, 20:53
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-27, 21:44
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2011-04-28, 05:12
+
Owen OMalley 2011-04-28, 20:33
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-28, 22:12
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [Discuss] Merge federation branch HDFS-1052 into trunk
Thanks for clarifying, Owen.
Should we have the bylaws somewhere on wiki?
--Konstantin
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:12 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
>
> > The question is whether this is a
> > * Code Change,
> > which requires Lazy consensus of active committers or a
> > * Adoption of New Codebase,
> > which needs Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members
>
> This is a code change, just like all of our jiras. The standard rules of at
> least one +1 on the jira and no -1's apply.
>
> Adoption of new codebase is adopting a new subproject or completely
> replacing trunk.
>
> > Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes.
>
> This was clarified in the bylaws back in November.
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201011.mbox/%[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E
>
> Where it was modified to:
>
> Lazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of
> one +1. The code can be committed after the first +1.
>
> -- Owen
+
Todd Lipcon 2011-05-02, 21:44
+
suresh srinivas 2011-05-03, 02:17
+
Sanjay Radia 2011-04-27, 00:26
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-04-27, 00:59
+
Dhruba Borthakur 2011-04-27, 04:27
+
Tsz Wo \ 2011-04-27, 05:16
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2011-04-27, 05:36
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2011-04-27, 05:40
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-27, 06:28
+
Sanjay Radia 2011-04-27, 14:03
+
Eli Collins 2011-04-27, 21:36
+
suresh srinivas 2011-04-28, 00:22