The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/

Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328

0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots feature.
RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all fixed committed since the last RC.

The full list of changes is available here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907

Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.

The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so that we can gauge the coverage)

Thanks.

-- Lars

Lars:
HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.

I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you
locally.

Cheers

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>
> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>
> 0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved
> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
> These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots
> feature.
> RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
> fixed committed since the last RC.
>
> The full list of changes is available here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>
> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>
> The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so
> that we can gauge the coverage)
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Lars

No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why nothing is working :)

Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting for an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both builds.
-- Lars

________________________________
 From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
 

Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.

I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you locally.

Cheers
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>
>Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>
>0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots feature.
>RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all fixed committed since the last RC.
>
>The full list of changes is available here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>
>Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>
>The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
>(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so that we can gauge the coverage)
>
>Thanks.
>
>-- Lars

ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline

Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we have
Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.

Just my two cents.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why
> nothing is working :)
>
> Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting for
> an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both
> builds.
>
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> available for download
>
>
> Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.
>
> I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you
> locally.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
> >
> >Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> >
> >0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved
> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
> >These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots
> feature.
> >RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
> fixed committed since the last RC.
> >
> >The full list of changes is available here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
> >
> >Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
> >
> >The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
> >(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so
> that we can gauge the coverage)
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >-- Lars
>

Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.

________________________________
 From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
 

ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline

Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we have Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.

Just my two cents.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why nothing is working :)
>
>Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting for an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both builds.
>
>
>-- Lars
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
>Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
>
>
>
>Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.
>
>I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you locally.
>
>Cheers
>
>
>On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>>
>>Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>>
>>0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>>These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots feature.
>>RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all fixed committed since the last RC.
>>
>>The full list of changes is available here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>>
>>Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>>
>>The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
>>(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so that we can gauge the coverage)
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>-- Lars

Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from SVN.
In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.

No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not) multiple times before I spun the RC.

-- Lars

________________________________
 From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
 
Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.

________________________________
From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline

Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we have Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.

Just my two cents.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why nothing is working :)
>
>Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting for an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both builds.
>
>
>-- Lars
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
>Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
>
>
>
>Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.
>
>I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you locally.
>
>Cheers
>
>
>On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>>
>>Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>>
>>0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>>These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots feature.
>>RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all fixed committed since the last RC.
>>
>>The full list of changes is available here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>>
>>Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>>
>>The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
>>(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so that we can gauge the coverage)
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>-- Lars

Understood, Lars.

This situation rarely happens.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from SVN.
>
>
> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
>
> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
> multiple times before I spun the RC.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> available for download
>
> Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> available for download
>
>
> ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline
>
> Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we
> have Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
> That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why
> nothing is working :)
> >
> >Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting for
> an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both
> builds.
> >
> >
> >-- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> >________________________________
> > From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
> >Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> available for download
> >
> >
> >
> >Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.
> >
> >I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you
> locally.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
> >>
> >>Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> >>
> >>0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved
> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
> >>These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots
> feature.
> >>RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
> fixed committed since the last RC.
> >>
> >>The full list of changes is available here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
> >>
> >>Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
> >>
> >>The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
> >>(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so
> that we can gauge the coverage)
> >>
> >>Thanks.
> >>
> >>-- Lars
>

Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:

Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13

[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Understood, Lars.
>
> This situation rarely happens.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from SVN.
>>
>>
>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
>>
>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
>> multiple times before I spun the RC.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>> available for download
>>
>> Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>> available for download
>>
>>
>> ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline
>>
>> Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we
>> have Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
>> That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.
>>
>> Just my two cents.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why
>> nothing is working :)
>> >
>> >Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting for
>> an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both
>> builds.
>> >
>> >
>> >-- Lars
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >________________________________
>> > From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
>> >Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>> available for download
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.
>> >
>> >I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you
>> locally.
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>> >>
>> >>Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>> >>
>> >>0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved
>> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>> >>These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
>> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots
>> feature.
>> >>RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
>> fixed committed since the last RC.
>> >>
>> >>The full list of changes is available here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>> >>
>> >>Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
>> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>> >>
>> >>The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>> >>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
>> >>(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so
>> that we can gauge the coverage)
>> >>
>> >>Thanks.
>> >>
>> >>-- Lars
>>
>
>

Same test is still failing for me.

Tests in error:
  testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
(RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.

Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
Tests in error:
  testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
(RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.

Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
Failed twice in a row with RC1, same for RC2.

JM

2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:
>
> Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Understood, Lars.
>>
>> This situation rarely happens.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
>>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from SVN.
>>>
>>>
>>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
>>>
>>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
>>> multiple times before I spun the RC.
>>>
>>> -- Lars
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>> available for download
>>>
>>> Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>> available for download
>>>
>>>
>>> ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline
>>>
>>> Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we
>>> have Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
>>> That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.
>>>
>>> Just my two cents.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why
>>> nothing is working :)
>>> >
>>> >Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting for
>>> an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both
>>> builds.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >-- Lars
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >________________________________
>>> > From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
>>> >Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>> available for download
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.
>>> >
>>> >I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you
>>> locally.
>>> >
>>> >Cheers
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>>> >>
>>> >>Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>>> >>
>>> >>0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved
>>> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>>> >>These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
>>> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots
>>> feature.
>>> >>RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
>>> fixed committed since the last RC.

Can you elaborate more on the failure JM.

Can you upload (pastebin) Test-output file?

It pass on my local.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same test is still failing for me.
>
> Tests in error:
>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>
> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>
>
> Tests in error:
>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>
> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>
>
> Failed twice in a row with RC1, same for RC2.
>
> JM
>
> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:
>>
>> Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>>
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
>> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Understood, Lars.
>>>
>>> This situation rarely happens.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
>>>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from SVN.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
>>>>
>>>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
>>>> multiple times before I spun the RC.
>>>>
>>>> -- Lars
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>>> available for download
>>>>
>>>> Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>>> available for download
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline
>>>>
>>>> Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we
>>>> have Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
>>>> That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.
>>>>
>>>> Just my two cents.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why
>>>> nothing is working :)
>>>> >
>>>> >Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting for
>>>> an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both
>>>> builds.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >-- Lars
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >________________________________
>>>> > From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> >Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
>>>> >Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>>> available for download
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still pending.
>>>> >
>>>> >I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for you
>>>> locally.
>>>> >
>>>> >Cheers
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>>>> >>
>>>> >>0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved

The test passed (on Mac and Linux) standalone:

Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 93.51 sec

Running test suite now.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Same test is still failing for me.
>
> Tests in error:
>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>
> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>
>
> Tests in error:
>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>
> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>
>
> Failed twice in a row with RC1, same for RC2.
>
> JM
>
> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:
> >
> > Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
> >
> > [INFO]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> > [INFO]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
> > [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Understood, Lars.
> >>
> >> This situation rarely happens.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
> >>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from
> SVN.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
> >>>
> >>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
> >>> multiple times before I spun the RC.
> >>>
> >>> -- Lars
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> >>> available for download
> >>>
> >>> Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
> >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> >>> available for download
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline
> >>>
> >>> Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we
> >>> have Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
> >>> That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.
> >>>
> >>> Just my two cents.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder why
> >>> nothing is working :)
> >>> >
> >>> >Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting
> for
> >>> an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both
> >>> builds.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >-- Lars
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >________________________________
> >>> > From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> >Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM
> >>> >Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> >>> available for download
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >Lars:HBase-0.94-security and HBase-0.94 Jenkins builds are still
> pending.
> >>> >
> >>> >I assume test suite for both secure and insecure profiles passed for
> you
> >>> locally.
> >>> >
> >>> >Cheers
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:24 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at

I used security profile:

Tests run: 1381, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13

[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 1:07:02.771s
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 21:08:34 UTC 2013

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The test passed (on Mac and Linux) standalone:
>
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 93.51 sec
>
> Running test suite now.
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Same test is still failing for me.
>>
>> Tests in error:
>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>>
>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>>
>>
>> Tests in error:
>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>>
>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>>
>>
>> Failed twice in a row with RC1, same for RC2.
>>
>> JM
>>
>> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:
>> >
>> > Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>> > [INFO]
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > [INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
>> > [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Understood, Lars.
>> >>
>> >> This situation rarely happens.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
>> >>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from
>> SVN.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
>> >>>
>> >>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
>> >>> multiple times before I spun the RC.
>> >>>
>> >>> -- Lars
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ________________________________
>> >>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>> >>> available for download
>> >>>
>> >>> Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ________________________________
>> >>> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
>> >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>> >>> available for download
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline
>> >>>
>> >>> Does it make sense to hold checkin for 0.94 a little longer so that we
>> >>> have Jenkins builds for both profiles ?
>> >>> That way there is clear correlation between RC2 and Jenkins builds.
>> >>>
>> >>> Just my two cents.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> No Ted, I released this just to screw everybody and have you wonder
>> why
>> >>> nothing is working :)
>> >>> >
>> >>> >Seriously... Did the exact jenkins build locally, instead of waiting
>> for
>> >>> an entire day to get a slot on a jenkins VM. All tests passed in both
>> >>> builds.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >-- Lars
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >________________________________
>> >>> > From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>> >Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:36 PM

Still not working for me even standalone. It's on a dedicated test
machine. There is only that running...

I will continue with the other tests (balancers, etc.) but I'm
interested to understand why this one keeps failing for me... I will
try it on other computers too.

-------------------------------------------------------
 T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 19.686
sec <<< FAILURE!

Results :

Tests in error:
  testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
(RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.

Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I used security profile:
>
> Tests run: 1381, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 1:07:02.771s
> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 21:08:34 UTC 2013
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The test passed (on Mac and Linux) standalone:
>>
>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 93.51 sec
>>
>> Running test suite now.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Same test is still failing for me.
>>>
>>> Tests in error:
>>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
>>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>>>
>>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>>>
>>>
>>> Tests in error:
>>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
>>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>>>
>>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>>>
>>>
>>> Failed twice in a row with RC1, same for RC2.
>>>
>>> JM
>>>
>>> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> > Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:
>>> >
>>> > Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>>> >
>>> > [INFO]
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>>> > [INFO]
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > [INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
>>> > [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Understood, Lars.
>>> >>
>>> >> This situation rarely happens.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
>>> >>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from
>>> SVN.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
>>> >>> multiple times before I spun the RC.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -- Lars
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ________________________________
>>> >>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
>>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>> >>> available for download
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Ah that explains that.I'm fine either way.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ________________________________
>>> >>> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:00 PM
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>> >>> available for download
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ubuntu2 and ubuntu3 were offline

Maybe move discussion of this test to a separate thread.

Can you provide the following information:

the OS of the machine where the test failed.
test output from this test

Thanks

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Still not working for me even standalone. It's on a dedicated test
> machine. There is only that running...
>
> I will continue with the other tests (balancers, etc.) but I'm
> interested to understand why this one keeps failing for me... I will
> try it on other computers too.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>  T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 19.686
> sec <<< FAILURE!
>
> Results :
>
> Tests in error:
>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
>
>
> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I used security profile:
> >
> > Tests run: 1381, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
> >
> > [INFO]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> > [INFO]
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [INFO] Total time: 1:07:02.771s
> > [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 21:08:34 UTC 2013
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The test passed (on Mac and Linux) standalone:
> >>
> >> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
> >> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 93.51
> sec
> >>
> >> Running test suite now.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Same test is still failing for me.
> >>>
> >>> Tests in error:
> >>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
> >>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
> >>>
> >>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Tests in error:
> >>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
> >>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
> >>>
> >>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Failed twice in a row with RC1, same for RC2.
> >>>
> >>> JM
> >>>
> >>> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> > Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:
> >>> >
> >>> > Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
> >>> >
> >>> > [INFO]
> >>> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> >>> > [INFO]
> >>> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > [INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
> >>> > [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Understood, Lars.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> This situation rarely happens.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
> >>> >>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from
> >>> SVN.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
> >>> >>> multiple times before I spun the RC.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> -- Lars
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> ________________________________
> >>> >>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> >>> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
> >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
> >>> >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is

Passes fine for me, each time. Passed fine on jenkins too (when that was still working). Passed for Ted, too. Must be something in your environment.

What is it failing on (i.e. check the out put of the shell test)?

Do you see any problem when you actually use the shell?

________________________________
 From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
 
Still not working for me even standalone. It's on a dedicated test
machine. There is only that running...

I will continue with the other tests (balancers, etc.) but I'm
interested to understand why this one keeps failing for me... I will
try it on other computers too.

-------------------------------------------------------
T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 19.686
sec <<< FAILURE!

Results :

Tests in error:
  testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
(RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.

Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I used security profile:
>
> Tests run: 1381, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 1:07:02.771s
> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 21:08:34 UTC 2013
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The test passed (on Mac and Linux) standalone:
>>
>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 93.51 sec
>>
>> Running test suite now.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Same test is still failing for me.
>>>
>>> Tests in error:
>>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
>>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>>>
>>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>>>
>>>
>>> Tests in error:
>>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
>>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>>>
>>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>>>
>>>
>>> Failed twice in a row with RC1, same for RC2.
>>>
>>> JM
>>>
>>> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> > Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:
>>> >
>>> > Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>>> >
>>> > [INFO]
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>>> > [INFO]
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > [INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
>>> > [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Understood, Lars.
>>> >>
>>> >> This situation rarely happens.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
>>> >>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from
>>> SVN.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)
>>> >>> multiple times before I spun the RC.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -- Lars
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ________________________________
>>> >>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>> To: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <
>>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 7:26 PM
>>> >>

Pass for me also on another computer. I will start another thread for
TestShell. It's also failing with 0.94.5 on the same computer, so not
related to this RC.
2013/3/15 lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Passes fine for me, each time. Passed fine on jenkins too (when that was still working). Passed for Ted, too. Must be something in your environment.
>
> What is it failing on (i.e. check the out put of the shell test)?
>
> Do you see any problem when you actually use the shell?
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 4:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
>
> Still not working for me even standalone. It's on a dedicated test
> machine. There is only that running...
>
> I will continue with the other tests (balancers, etc.) but I'm
> interested to understand why this one keeps failing for me... I will
> try it on other computers too.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> T E S T S
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 19.686
> sec <<< FAILURE!
>
> Results :
>
> Tests in error:
>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
>
>
> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I used security profile:
>>
>> Tests run: 1381, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>>
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>> [INFO]
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 1:07:02.771s
>> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 21:08:34 UTC 2013
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The test passed (on Mac and Linux) standalone:
>>>
>>> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell
>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 93.51 sec
>>>
>>> Running test suite now.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Same test is still failing for me.
>>>>
>>>> Tests in error:
>>>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
>>>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>>>>
>>>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tests in error:
>>>>   testRunShellTests(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell):
>>>> (RuntimeError) Shell unit tests failed. Check output file for details.
>>>>
>>>> Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 13
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Failed twice in a row with RC1, same for RC2.
>>>>
>>>> JM
>>>>
>>>> 2013/3/15 Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> > Here was test suite under security profile on 64 bit Linux box:
>>>> >
>>>> > Tests run: 1380, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13
>>>> >
>>>> > [INFO]
>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>>>> > [INFO]
>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > [INFO] Total time: 1:06:14.973s
>>>> > [INFO] Finished at: Fri Mar 15 02:47:44 UTC 2013
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Understood, Lars.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> This situation rarely happens.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Jenkins VMs are *incredibly* slow right now.
>>>> >>> Security build is running for 39 mins and has not even sync'ed from
>>>> SVN.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> In the 0.94 build I see the small tests timing out.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> No need to wait for this. I ran the entire suite (security and not)

Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended yesterday).

I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using 150 mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR switch all was good.

-- Lars

________________________________
 From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available for download
 
The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/

Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328

0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots feature.
RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all fixed committed since the last RC.

The full list of changes is available here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907

Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.

The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
(if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so that we can gauge the coverage)

Thanks.

-- Lars

Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.

Here is a +1 for RC2.

Checked md5.

Checked signing.

Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats fine I'd
say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.

Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all loaded.

Logs look good.

St.Ack
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended yesterday).
>
> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using 150
> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR switch all
> was good.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available
> for download
>
> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>
> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>
> 0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved
> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
> These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots
> feature.
> RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
> fixed committed since the last RC.
>
> The full list of changes is available here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>
> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>
> The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so
> that we can gauge the coverage)
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Lars
>

Sorry for the delay.

I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before EOD.

JM

2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
>
> Here is a +1 for RC2.
>
> Checked md5.
>
> Checked signing.
>
> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats fine I'd
> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
>
> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all loaded.
>
> Logs look good.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended yesterday).
>>
>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using 150
>> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR switch all
>> was good.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM
>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available
>> for download
>>
>> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>>
>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>>
>> 0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved
>> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>> These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
>> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots
>> feature.
>> RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
>> fixed committed since the last RC.
>>
>> The full list of changes is available here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>>
>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
>> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>>
>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so
>> that we can gauge the coverage)
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -- Lars
>>

Hi,

I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.

Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went well.

Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not sink
the release.

So overall, I'm +1.

JM

2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before EOD.
>
> JM
>
> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
>>
>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
>>
>> Checked md5.
>>
>> Checked signing.
>>
>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats fine I'd
>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
>>
>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all loaded.
>>
>> Logs look good.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended yesterday).
>>>
>>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using 150
>>> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR switch all
>>> was good.
>>>
>>> -- Lars
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM
>>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is available
>>> for download
>>>
>>> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>>>
>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>>>
>>> 0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues resolved
>>> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>>> These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
>>> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase snapshots
>>> feature.
>>> RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
>>> fixed committed since the last RC.
>>>
>>> The full list of changes is available here:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>>>
>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
>>> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>>>
>>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bGJyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
>>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so
>>> that we can gauge the coverage)
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -- Lars
>>>

+1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests such as
BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've
updated the release spreadsheet.
Thanks,
-Jeffreyz

On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.
>
>Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
>Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
>(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
>Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went well.
>
>Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not sink
>the release.
>
>So overall, I'm +1.
>
>JM
>
>2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Sorry for the delay.
>>
>> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before EOD.
>>
>> JM
>>
>> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
>>>
>>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
>>>
>>> Checked md5.
>>>
>>> Checked signing.
>>>
>>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats fine
>>>I'd
>>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
>>>
>>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all loaded.
>>>
>>> Logs look good.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended
>>>>yesterday).
>>>>
>>>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using 150
>>>> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR switch
>>>>all
>>>> was good.
>>>>
>>>> -- Lars
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM
>>>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>>>>available
>>>> for download
>>>>
>>>> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>>>>
>>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>>>>
>>>> 0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues
>>>>resolved
>>>> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>>>> These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
>>>> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase
>>>>snapshots
>>>> feature.
>>>> RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
>>>> fixed committed since the last RC.
>>>>
>>>> The full list of changes is available here:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
>>>>
>>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
>>>> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
>>>>
>>>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bG
>>>>JyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
>>>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet,
>>>>so
>>>> that we can gauge the coverage)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -- Lars
>>>>

+1

 - verified md5, asc
 - Build with hadoop 2 and hadoop 1
 - Run local mode cluster, and these tests:
 - bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write 10:10:100
-num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30
 - bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify
-Dloadmapper.backrefs=10 -Dloadmapper.map.tasks=10
-Dloadmapper.num_to_write=100000 -Dverify.reduce.tasks=1
-Dverify.scannercaching=10000 loadAndVerify"
 bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList Loop
2 1 3000000 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1"

Also based on Jeff's tests run on multi-node cluster.

Enis

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> +1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests such as
> BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've
> updated the release spreadsheet.
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Jeffreyz
>
> On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.
> >
> >Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
> >Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
> >(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
> >Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went well.
> >
> >Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not sink
> >the release.
> >
> >So overall, I'm +1.
> >
> >JM
> >
> >2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Sorry for the delay.
> >>
> >> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before EOD.
> >>
> >> JM
> >>
> >> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
> >>>
> >>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
> >>>
> >>> Checked md5.
> >>>
> >>> Checked signing.
> >>>
> >>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats fine
> >>>I'd
> >>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
> >>>
> >>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all loaded.
> >>>
> >>> Logs look good.
> >>>
> >>> St.Ack
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended
> >>>>yesterday).
> >>>>
> >>>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using 150
> >>>> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR switch
> >>>>all
> >>>> was good.
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Lars
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ________________________________
> >>>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM
> >>>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> >>>>available
> >>>> for download
> >>>>
> >>>> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> >>>>
> >>>> 0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues
> >>>>resolved
> >>>> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
> >>>> These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
> >>>> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase
> >>>>snapshots
> >>>> feature.
> >>>> RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
> >>>> fixed committed since the last RC.
> >>>>
> >>>> The full list of changes is available here:
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907
> >>>>
> >>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
> >>>> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as 0.94.6.
> >>>>
> >>>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bG
> >>>>JyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0
> >>>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet,
> >>>>so

Hi Enis,

What the expected result of the IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify?

I got that on my side:
13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     ROWS_WRITTEN=0
13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855805

Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
2013/3/22 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1
>
>  - verified md5, asc
>  - Build with hadoop 2 and hadoop 1
>  - Run local mode cluster, and these tests:
>  - bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write 10:10:100
> -num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30
>  - bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify
> -Dloadmapper.backrefs=10 -Dloadmapper.map.tasks=10
> -Dloadmapper.num_to_write=100000 -Dverify.reduce.tasks=1
> -Dverify.scannercaching=10000 loadAndVerify"
>  bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList Loop
> 2 1 3000000 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1"
>
> Also based on Jeff's tests run on multi-node cluster.
>
> Enis
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> +1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests such as
>> BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've
>> updated the release spreadsheet.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Jeffreyz
>>
>> On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.
>> >
>> >Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
>> >Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
>> >(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
>> >Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went well.
>> >
>> >Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not sink
>> >the release.
>> >
>> >So overall, I'm +1.
>> >
>> >JM
>> >
>> >2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> Sorry for the delay.
>> >>
>> >> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before EOD.
>> >>
>> >> JM
>> >>
>> >> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
>> >>>
>> >>> Checked md5.
>> >>>
>> >>> Checked signing.
>> >>>
>> >>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats fine
>> >>>I'd
>> >>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
>> >>>
>> >>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all loaded.
>> >>>
>> >>> Logs look good.
>> >>>
>> >>> St.Ack
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended
>> >>>>yesterday).
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using 150
>> >>>> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR switch
>> >>>>all
>> >>>> was good.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -- Lars
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ________________________________
>> >>>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM
>> >>>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
>> >>>>available
>> >>>> for download
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues
>> >>>>resolved
>> >>>> against it, contributed by 28 individuals.
>> >>>> These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively small
>> >>>> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase
>> >>>>snapshots
>> >>>> feature.
>> >>>> RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls in all
>> >>>> fixed committed since the last RC.
>

> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
Yes that is very interesting. Could you please post the logs if you have
them.

Enis
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Enis,
>
> What the expected result of the IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify?
>
> I got that on my side:
> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     ROWS_WRITTEN=0
> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855805
>
> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
>
>
> 2013/3/22 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > +1
> >
> >  - verified md5, asc
> >  - Build with hadoop 2 and hadoop 1
> >  - Run local mode cluster, and these tests:
> >  - bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write 10:10:100
> > -num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30
> >  - bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify
> > -Dloadmapper.backrefs=10 -Dloadmapper.map.tasks=10
> > -Dloadmapper.num_to_write=100000 -Dverify.reduce.tasks=1
> > -Dverify.scannercaching=10000 loadAndVerify"
> >  bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList
> Loop
> > 2 1 3000000 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1"
> >
> > Also based on Jeff's tests run on multi-node cluster.
> >
> > Enis
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> +1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests such as
> >> BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've
> >> updated the release spreadsheet.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Jeffreyz
> >>
> >> On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.
> >> >
> >> >Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
> >> >Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
> >> >(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
> >> >Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went well.
> >> >
> >> >Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not sink
> >> >the release.
> >> >
> >> >So overall, I'm +1.
> >> >
> >> >JM
> >> >
> >> >2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >> Sorry for the delay.
> >> >>
> >> >> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before EOD.
> >> >>
> >> >> JM
> >> >>
> >> >> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Checked md5.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Checked signing.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats
> fine
> >> >>>I'd
> >> >>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all loaded.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Logs look good.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> St.Ack
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >>>wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended
> >> >>>>yesterday).
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using
> 150
> >> >>>> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR
> switch
> >> >>>>all
> >> >>>> was good.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> -- Lars
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ________________________________
> >> >>>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >>>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM
> >> >>>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is
> >> >>>>available
> >> >>>> for download
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download at
> >> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328

Hi Enis,

I just retried and now I'm getting:
13/03/27 15:21:22 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855437

Which log do you want? Master logs? the console ouput?

JMS

2013/3/25 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
> Yes that is very interesting. Could you please post the logs if you have
> them.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Enis,
>>
>> What the expected result of the IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify?
>>
>> I got that on my side:
>> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
>> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     ROWS_WRITTEN=0
>> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855805
>>
>> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
>>
>>
>> 2013/3/22 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > +1
>> >
>> >  - verified md5, asc
>> >  - Build with hadoop 2 and hadoop 1
>> >  - Run local mode cluster, and these tests:
>> >  - bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write 10:10:100
>> > -num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30
>> >  - bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify
>> > -Dloadmapper.backrefs=10 -Dloadmapper.map.tasks=10
>> > -Dloadmapper.num_to_write=100000 -Dverify.reduce.tasks=1
>> > -Dverify.scannercaching=10000 loadAndVerify"
>> >  bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList
>> Loop
>> > 2 1 3000000 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1"
>> >
>> > Also based on Jeff's tests run on multi-node cluster.
>> >
>> > Enis
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests such as
>> >> BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've
>> >> updated the release spreadsheet.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Jeffreyz
>> >>
>> >> On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> >I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.
>> >> >
>> >> >Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
>> >> >Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
>> >> >(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
>> >> >Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went well.
>> >> >
>> >> >Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not sink
>> >> >the release.
>> >> >
>> >> >So overall, I'm +1.
>> >> >
>> >> >JM
>> >> >
>> >> >2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> >> Sorry for the delay.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before EOD.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> JM
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> >>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Checked md5.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Checked signing.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats
>> fine
>> >> >>>I'd
>> >> >>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all loaded.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Logs look good.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> St.Ack
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> >>>wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended
>> >> >>>>yesterday).
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using
>> 150
>> >> >>>> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR
>> switch
>> >> >>>>all
>> >> >>>> was good.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> -- Lars
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> ________________________________
>> >> >>>>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> >>>> To: hbase-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> >>

If you can, master and console logs should be fine.

Enis
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Enis,
>
> I just retried and now I'm getting:
> 13/03/27 15:21:22 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855437
>
> Which log do you want? Master logs? the console ouput?
>
> JMS
>
> 2013/3/25 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
> > Yes that is very interesting. Could you please post the logs if you have
> > them.
> >
> > Enis
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Enis,
> >>
> >> What the expected result of the IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify?
> >>
> >> I got that on my side:
> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:
> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     ROWS_WRITTEN=0
> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855805
> >>
> >> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/3/22 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> >  - verified md5, asc
> >> >  - Build with hadoop 2 and hadoop 1
> >> >  - Run local mode cluster, and these tests:
> >> >  - bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write
> 10:10:100
> >> > -num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30
> >> >  - bin/hbase
> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify
> >> > -Dloadmapper.backrefs=10 -Dloadmapper.map.tasks=10
> >> > -Dloadmapper.num_to_write=100000 -Dverify.reduce.tasks=1
> >> > -Dverify.scannercaching=10000 loadAndVerify"
> >> >  bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList
> >> Loop
> >> > 2 1 3000000 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1"
> >> >
> >> > Also based on Jeff's tests run on multi-node cluster.
> >> >
> >> > Enis
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> +1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests
> such as
> >> >> BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've
> >> >> updated the release spreadsheet.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> -Jeffreyz
> >> >>
> >> >> On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
> >> >> >Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
> >> >> >(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
> >> >> >Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went
> well.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not
> sink
> >> >> >the release.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >So overall, I'm +1.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >JM
> >> >> >
> >> >> >2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >> >> Sorry for the delay.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before
> EOD.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> JM
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >> >>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Checked md5.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Checked signing.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats
> >> fine
> >> >> >>>I'd
> >> >> >>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all
> loaded.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Logs look good.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> St.Ack
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> >> >>>wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended
> >> >> >>>>yesterday).
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using

Here you go:

http://www.spaggiari.org/logs.tar.bz2

JMS

2013/3/27 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you can, master and console logs should be fine.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Enis,
>>
>> I just retried and now I'm getting:
>> 13/03/27 15:21:22 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855437
>>
>> Which log do you want? Master logs? the console ouput?
>>
>> JMS
>>
>> 2013/3/25 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
>> > Yes that is very interesting. Could you please post the logs if you have
>> > them.
>> >
>> > Enis
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Enis,
>> >>
>> >> What the expected result of the IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify?
>> >>
>> >> I got that on my side:
>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:
>> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     ROWS_WRITTEN=0
>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855805
>> >>
>> >> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/3/22 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> > +1
>> >> >
>> >> >  - verified md5, asc
>> >> >  - Build with hadoop 2 and hadoop 1
>> >> >  - Run local mode cluster, and these tests:
>> >> >  - bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write
>> 10:10:100
>> >> > -num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30
>> >> >  - bin/hbase
>> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify
>> >> > -Dloadmapper.backrefs=10 -Dloadmapper.map.tasks=10
>> >> > -Dloadmapper.num_to_write=100000 -Dverify.reduce.tasks=1
>> >> > -Dverify.scannercaching=10000 loadAndVerify"
>> >> >  bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList
>> >> Loop
>> >> > 2 1 3000000 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1"
>> >> >
>> >> > Also based on Jeff's tests run on multi-node cluster.
>> >> >
>> >> > Enis
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> +1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests
>> such as
>> >> >> BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've
>> >> >> updated the release spreadsheet.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> -Jeffreyz
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
>> >> >> >Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
>> >> >> >(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
>> >> >> >Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went
>> well.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not
>> sink
>> >> >> >the release.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >So overall, I'm +1.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >JM
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> >> >> Sorry for the delay.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before
>> EOD.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> JM
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >> >> >>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Checked md5.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Checked signing.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats
>> >> fine
>> >> >> >>>I'd
>> >> >> >>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all
>> loaded.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Logs look good.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> St.Ack
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >

Hi Enis,

Did you find anything usefull from the logs?

JM

2013/3/27 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here you go:
>
> http://www.spaggiari.org/logs.tar.bz2
>
> JMS
>
> 2013/3/27 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> If you can, master and console logs should be fine.
>>
>> Enis
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Enis,
>>>
>>> I just retried and now I'm getting:
>>> 13/03/27 15:21:22 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855437
>>>
>>> Which log do you want? Master logs? the console ouput?
>>>
>>> JMS
>>>
>>> 2013/3/25 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> >> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
>>> > Yes that is very interesting. Could you please post the logs if you have
>>> > them.
>>> >
>>> > Enis
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
>>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Enis,
>>> >>
>>> >> What the expected result of the IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify?
>>> >>
>>> >> I got that on my side:
>>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:
>>> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
>>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     ROWS_WRITTEN=0
>>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855805
>>> >>
>>> >> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2013/3/22 Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> >> > +1
>>> >> >
>>> >> >  - verified md5, asc
>>> >> >  - Build with hadoop 2 and hadoop 1
>>> >> >  - Run local mode cluster, and these tests:
>>> >> >  - bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write
>>> 10:10:100
>>> >> > -num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30
>>> >> >  - bin/hbase
>>> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify
>>> >> > -Dloadmapper.backrefs=10 -Dloadmapper.map.tasks=10
>>> >> > -Dloadmapper.num_to_write=100000 -Dverify.reduce.tasks=1
>>> >> > -Dverify.scannercaching=10000 loadAndVerify"
>>> >> >  bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList
>>> >> Loop
>>> >> > 2 1 3000000 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1"
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Also based on Jeff's tests run on multi-node cluster.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Enis
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Zhong <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >> >wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> +1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests
>>> such as
>>> >> >> BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've
>>> >> >> updated the release spreadsheet.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Thanks,
>>> >> >> -Jeffreyz
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >Hi,
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well.
>>> >> >> >Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well.
>>> >> >> >(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13)
>>> >> >> >Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went
>>> well.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not
>>> sink
>>> >> >> >the release.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >So overall, I'm +1.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >JM
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> >> >> >> Sorry for the delay.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before
>>> EOD.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> JM
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> 2013/3/22 Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> >> >> >>> Hmm.  Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Here is a +1 for RC2.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Checked md5.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Checked signing.
>>> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats
>>> >> fine
>>> >> >> >>>I'd
>>> >> >> >>> say.  The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version.