Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # dev >> Hadoop 0.19.1


+
Nigel Daley 2009-01-30, 00:16
+
Steve Loughran 2009-01-30, 10:36
+
stack 2009-01-30, 17:36
+
Raghu Angadi 2009-01-31, 00:54
+
Raghu Angadi 2009-01-31, 01:16
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2009-02-02, 19:59
+
Doug Judd 2009-02-02, 20:51
+
Owen OMalley 2009-02-02, 21:51
+
Jim Kellerman 2009-02-02, 21:59
+
Doug Judd 2009-02-02, 22:02
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2009-02-03, 00:23
+
Doug Judd 2009-02-03, 02:18
+
Sanjay Radia 2009-02-04, 03:01
+
Sanjay Radia 2009-02-04, 03:02
+
Steve Loughran 2009-02-04, 11:38
+
Sanjay Radia 2009-02-06, 00:25
+
Doug Cutting 2009-02-06, 18:35
+
Sanjay Radia 2009-02-06, 18:56
+
Doug Cutting 2009-02-06, 19:33
+
Doug Cutting 2009-02-06, 20:08
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2009-02-06, 20:55
+
Doug Cutting 2009-02-06, 21:19
+
Raghu Angadi 2009-02-07, 00:34
+
Steve Loughran 2009-02-09, 16:39
+
Steve Loughran 2009-02-09, 16:37
+
Koji Noguchi 2009-02-06, 19:38
+
stack 2009-02-04, 18:47
+
Nigel Daley 2009-02-11, 20:47
+
Dhruba Borthakur 2009-02-12, 01:14
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Hadoop 0.19.1

On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:

> On Feb 2, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Doug Judd wrote:
>
> > What do you recommend?  Is there anyway we could get these two
> > issues fixed
> > for 0.19.1, or should I file issues for them and get them on the
> > schedule
> > for 0.19.2?
>
> Given the outstanding problems and general level of uncertainty, I'd
> favor releasing a 0.19.1 with the equivalent of the 0.18.3 disable on
> fsync and append. Let's get them fixed in 0.20 first and then we can
> debate whether the rewards of pushing them back into an 0.19.2 would
> make sense. I'm pretty uncomfortable at the moment with how the entire
> functional complex seems to cause a continuous stream of problems.
>
> -- Owen
>
+1
Append/sync code has been very problematic and bug fixes have not  
always fixed things completely.
Hence getting a quick  release of 0.19.1 that deal with the data loss  
(ie 0.18.3 functionality) is important.

sanjay
+
Jim Kellerman 2009-01-30, 17:46
+
stack 2009-02-04, 18:55
+
Sanjay Radia 2009-02-14, 23:52
+
Sanjay Radia 2009-02-14, 23:53
+
Steve Loughran 2009-02-16, 16:23
+
Ted Dunning 2009-02-16, 23:53
+
Doug Cutting 2009-02-18, 23:58
+
Sanjay Radia 2009-02-14, 23:54
+
Sanjay Radia 2009-02-14, 23:54