Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
MapReduce >> mail # dev >> [DISCUSS] Assume Private-Unstable for classes that are not annotated

Karthik Kambatla 2014-07-22, 21:55
Tsuyoshi OZAWA 2014-07-23, 12:32
Jason Lowe 2014-07-23, 14:23
Copy link to this message
Re: [DISCUSS] Assume Private-Unstable for classes that are not annotated
Fair points, Jason.

The fact that we include this in the compatibility guideline "should not"
affect how developers go about this. We should still strive to annotate
every new class we add, and reviewers should continue to check for them.
However, in case we miss annotations, we won't be burdened to support those
APIs for essentially eternity.

I am aware of downstream projects that use @Private APIs, but I have also
seen that improve in the recent past with compatible 2.x releases. So, I am
hoping they will let us know of APIs they would like to see and eventually
use only Public-Stable APIs.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Jason Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]lid>
Chris Nauroth 2014-07-25, 04:34
Karthik Kambatla 2014-07-25, 06:35
Sandy Ryza 2014-07-22, 22:44
Andrew Wang 2014-07-22, 23:55
Colin McCabe 2014-07-25, 17:15