Thanks Stack for giving a pointer to this. Yes it does seems this property
is very important.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 3:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Inconsistent scan performance with caching set to 1
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Jay T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Stack for pointing us in the right direction. Indeed it was
> > tcpNodeDelay setting. We set these to be true.
> > ipc.server.tcpnodelay ==> true
> > hbase.ipc.client.tcpnodelay ==> true
> > All reads that previously had the 40ms overhead are now between 2 and
> 3 ms
> > like we would expect them to be.
> > Are these settings worthy of being put in the Hbase online book ?
> I added a note on nagles to the book at your suggestion. We've toyed
> w/ making tcpnodelay true as default but as has been reasoned in the
> issue cited, it depends on cell sizes whether it effective or not. We
> should give this config. a higher profile than it currently has it