| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 1 to 10 from
10 (3.761s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: Cohesion of Hadoop team? - HDFS - [mail # user]
|
|
...The policy should be stated :-) It is: "All new features must be committed to trunk before or simultaneously with being committed to a lower-numbered branch." Thus, we don'...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-01-18, 18:59
|
|
|
[HDFS-3617] Port HDFS-96 to branch-1 (support blocks greater than 2GB) - HDFS - [issue]
|
|
...Please see HDFS-96....
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3617
Author: Matt Foley,
2012-10-17, 19:27
|
|
|
[HDFS-3700] Backport HDFS-3568 to branch-1 (fuse_dfs: add support for security) - HDFS - [issue]
|
|
...fuse_dfs should have support for Kerberos authentication. This would allow FUSE to be used in a secure cluster. Fixed for branch-2 in HDFS-3568....
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3700
Author: Matt Foley,
2012-07-23, 17:20
|
|
|
[HDFS-1726] query method for what kind of safe mode the Namenode is in - HDFS - [issue]
|
|
...If we could differentiate between "startup safemode" vs other safemode, it would be easier to do startup optimizations like HDFS-1295. Looking at FSNamesystem, this can be queried, but...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1726
Author: Matt Foley,
2012-07-13, 17:38
|
|
|
Re: [jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-3310) Make sure that we abort when no edit log directories are left - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Thanks Colin and Eli! Colin, for future reference, it is common to cut-and-paste the testpatch results into a comment in the Jira. Thanks....
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2012-04-26, 21:28
|
|
|
Re: Hadoop 1.0 and WebHDFS - HDFS - [mail # user]
|
|
...I would differ on the terminology. The 0.20/1.0 code line is STABLE. 0.21 is not, and probably never will be. 0.22 is said to be approaching stability, but has not been adj...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2012-02-03, 02:53
|
|
|
Re: Sizing help - HDFS - [mail # user]
|
|
...Todd is correct. The capability to recognize repaired disks and re-incorporate them is not available in the current implementation of disk fail-in-place. So the datanode se...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2011-11-15, 22:29
|
|
|
Re: Sizing help - HDFS - [mail # user]
|
|
...Nope; hot swap :-) On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Steve Ed wrote: I understand that with 0.20.204, loss of a disk doesn’t loss the node. But if we have to replace that...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2011-11-11, 18:15
|
|
|
Re: Sizing help - HDFS - [mail # user]
|
|
...I agree with Ted's argument that 3x replication is way better than 2x. But I do have to point out that, since 0.20.204, the loss of a disk no longer causes the loss of a whole node (th...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2011-11-11, 09:57
|
|
|
Re: Retire 0.20-append branch? - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...+1. On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2011-10-04, 21:12
|
|
|
|
