| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 1 to 10 from
168 (0.053s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Yeah, the inclusion of the binary in the source tarball was an oversight that has been corrected. If you're interested in the details: We require the javadocs to be built aggregately, ...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-18, 02:39
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3 - Accumulo - [mail # user]
|
|
...Just trying to get consensus, so we can move forward. :) Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Adam Fuchs wrote:...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-18, 02:26
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3 - Accumulo - [mail # user]
|
|
...So, I've fixed the problem with the src tarball including binaries, and I believe I've satisfied all the concerns regarding the naming conventions. I'm going to go ahead and include th...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-17, 22:15
|
|
|
Re: No init scripts or native sources in -bin distribution? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Mostly, oversight, when trying to make all the binary packages produce the same thing. They weren't deliberately excluded. If you say they work well, then I have no reason to exclude them, o...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-17, 21:57
|
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Thanks for that link, Billie. It was informative. when it comes to binary packages, is the *ability* of the source tarball to produce the binaries that we wish it to produce, since it ...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-17, 21:53
|
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...The expectation that downloading it, untar'ing it, and running it without compiling *does* (or should... that's what we're supposed to be reviewing) work with the -bin that was produced. Wha...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-17, 21:39
|
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Well, the reason not to, was to draw a line in the sand between what it means to have a "source" release, and a "binary" release. But, I agree that there's probably sufficient reason to incl...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-17, 18:31
|
|
|
Re: No init scripts or native sources in -bin distribution? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...We've been discussing on the user list whether to include source for native maps in the binary tarball. The consensus is slowly going towards that we should do so, and may end up in RC4. &nb...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-17, 18:30
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3 - Accumulo - [mail # user]
|
|
...All I did was: mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:...
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-17, 16:39
|
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Adam, I didn't make any changes on this, because there were only a few opinions, and it didn't seem like there was a consensus. I can make this change, though, if a consensus is established....
|
|
|
Author: Christopher,
2013-05-17, 15:53
|
|
|
|
