| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 1 to 10 from
268 (0.195s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
[ACCUMULO-1424] proxy TFramedTransport max size too small (should be configurable) - Accumulo - [issue]
|
|
...The TFramedTransport used by the proxy is limited by default to a 16MB max frame size. Messages bigger than that will be rejected by the server. This size should be configurable....
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1424
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-21, 23:51
|
|
|
[ACCUMULO-1421] use reflection to improve compatibility between Hadoop 1 and 2 - Accumulo - [issue]
|
|
...JobContext switches between an abstract class and an interface in hadoop 1 and 2, causing runtime compatibility problems in the compiled Accumulo bytecode. Avoid the runtime problem by using...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1421
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-21, 23:51
|
|
|
Re: master fails to start - Accumulo - [mail # user]
|
|
...Chris, Did you copy the conf/accumulo.policy.example to conf/accumulo.policy? If so, you may need to make some changes to account for changes to hadoop security. I suspect the problem ...
|
|
|
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-21, 18:45
|
|
|
Re: hadoop-2.0 incompatibility - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Yes, that's correct. It looks like we only need to exercise the two builds option if we find a need later on. Adam On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Christopher wrot...
|
|
|
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-21, 18:03
|
|
|
Re: hadoop-2.0 incompatibility - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...We still have the option of putting out a separate build for 1.5.0 compatibility with hadoop 2. Should we vote on that release separately? Seems like it should be easy to add more binary pac...
|
|
|
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-21, 16:00
|
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I stand corrected. Thanks for the link, Billie. Looks like we should also remove the .so file from the -src.tar.gz lest we risk having our project deleted. Adam On Fri, Ma...
|
|
|
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-18, 02:11
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] 1.5.0-RC3 - Accumulo - [mail # user]
|
|
...Thanks for putting up with us picky people, Chris! Adam On May 17, 2013 6:15 PM, "Christopher" wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-18, 01:03
|
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I'm with Michael on this one. We should really only be releasing one package that has all of the source and built binaries. IMO the interpretation of http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html t...
|
|
|
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-17, 21:12
|
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Just to solidify the decision that Chris is already leaning towards, let me try to clarify my position: 1. The only reason not to add the native library source code in the -bin.tar.gz distri...
|
|
|
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-17, 19:11
|
|
|
Re: Is C++ code still part of 1.5 release? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Chris, I like the idea of including the most widely used library, but empirical evidence tells me that roughly half of the users of Accumulo will still need to compile/recompile to get...
|
|
|
Author: Adam Fuchs,
2013-05-17, 18:04
|
|
|
|
