| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 71 to 80 from
274 (0.301s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
[VOTE] Release hadoop-0.22.0-rc0 - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...I created a release candidate for hadoop-0.22.0 available for review at: http://people.apache.org/~shv/hadoop-0.22.0-rc0/ The candidate incorporates more than 700 fixed jiras counting ...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-11-29, 10:47
|
|
|
Re: Homestretch for hadoop-0.22 - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...Great list Arun. I agree with most of them and will ad more. Thanks, On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-11-29, 09:43
|
|
|
[HDFS-111] UnderReplicationBlocks should use generic types - Hadoop - [issue]
|
|
...1. HADOOP-659 introduced new class UnderReplicationBlocks, andtwo new warnings about use of generic types TreeSet<Block>[] priorityQueues = new TreeSet&...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-111
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-11-21, 13:47
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-1.x.x off branch-0.20-security - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...Doesn't having trunk on lesser version than a branch make Hadoop versioning more confusing? People were asking for consistent non-confusing versioning schema. Why don't we instead call a vot...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-11-19, 00:30
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-1.x.x off branch-0.20-security - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...Let me repeat. By renaming ONLY 0.20.security to 1.0 you are replacing Hadoop-trunk with this branch. Is that the intention of the rename? Are we switching to the security branch as the new ...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-11-18, 03:29
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Hadoop 1.0? - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...A little wider perspective on where the renaming takes us and why it is happening. My opinion. Last year around this same time the Hadoop project was on the verge of splitting. We had ...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-11-16, 15:46
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-1.x.x off branch-0.20-security - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...I don't think we should vote it that way. Because 0.23 and 0.22 become confusing in this case. Unless you want to replace trunk with what is in 0.20.205. The three branches 0.20.securi...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-11-16, 07:36
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Hadoop 1.0? - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...Consistency of naming the releases is a very valid point and should be the main concern in the decision making. If 0.20.205 is called Hadoop 1, and 0.23 called Hadoop 2, then releasing...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-11-16, 07:26
|
|
|
Re: Homestretch for hadoop-0.22 - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...MAPREDUCE-2767 removed LinuxTaskController as discussed earlier. The idea is to port changes from 20.security in the subsequent release. Thanks, On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:43 PM, ...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-10-29, 18:23
|
|
|
Re: Homestretch for hadoop-0.22 - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...For upgrade we can directly (or indirectly) use HADOOP-7450 It's pre-mavenization. Cos, you might want to use it. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Harsh J wrote:...
|
|
|
Author: Konstantin Shvachko,
2011-10-28, 20:51
|
|
|
|
