| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 41 to 50 from
145 (0.089s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...We have already discussed this. Here is the recap: HDFS-347 does not support all the platforms. HDFS-2246 does. So removing HDFS-2246 does not make sense unless HDFS-347 supports all t...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-26, 17:33
|
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...ATM's suggestion of removing HDFS-2246 in trunk, but not branch-2, is I am not sure why a release that supports both these is such a bad idea. As Nicholas has stated these mecha...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-26, 00:09
|
|
|
[HDFS-1971] HA: Send block report from datanode to both active and standby namenodes - HDFS - [issue]
|
|
...To enable hot standby namenode, the standby node must have current information for - namenode state (image + edits) and block location information. This jira addresses keeping the block loca...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1971
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-22, 11:09
|
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote: This could be simpler. If HDFS-347 is configured, then use that method. If it does not work, then fall back to normal TCP ...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-21, 15:40
|
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: Yes. I have already stated this earlier. "... if the changes are deemed to be trivial, we can do it post merge to tru...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-21, 00:47
|
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Todd, we have different ways of reviewing and tracking work that happens in a branch. In fact if you look at snapshots branch, a functionality was coded and optimized/rewritten multiple time...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-21, 00:28
|
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Todd, can you please show in the jira or design document where explicitly it is stated that old short circuit will be removed. I agree that we need to move past the old short circuit, ...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-21, 00:04
|
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: This is a critical functionality for HBase peformance and an optimization we consider very important to have. I ...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-20, 23:31
|
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I actually look at the merge patch for reviewing all the changes going in, if I cannot track all the changes and the incremental updates that may not make sense if you do not follow the patc...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-20, 23:19
|
|
|
Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge - HDFS - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Todd, Some of us have been trying to help test and review the code. However you might have missed the following, which has resulted in the review not completing: 02/06/13 - After...
|
|
|
Author: Suresh Srinivas,
2013-02-20, 22:49
|
|
|
|
