| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 141 to 150 from
344 (0.13s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Allen Wittenauer wrote: My rationale for suggesting a release named 1.0 was that I prefer that release numbers say something about compatibility. The compatibility ru...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-04-06, 19:05
|
|
|
Re: Q about use of avro logs with hadoop streaming - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...Mona Gandhi wrote: Mona, There is currently no support for Avro data in streaming. One could use a shell command to convert Avro data to lines of text (e.g., Avro's &...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-04-06, 18:32
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Chris Douglas wrote: I think the HTTPD release rules are non-controversial and would support adoption of something similar. Someone needs to draft a proposal, initiat...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-04-02, 17:08
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Owen O'Malley wrote: For the record, I never proposed getting a 1.0 release out that had been scale tested in a few weeks. Rather, I proposed getting an alpha 1.0 rel...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-04-02, 16:09
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Chris Douglas wrote: So that folks can be told that if their code compiles without deprecation warnings against 1.0 then it should work for all 1.x releases. I was thinkin...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-04-01, 21:38
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Todd Lipcon wrote: Good to know. I' have to admit to being puzzled by HDFS-200, since Nicholas resolved it as a duplicate on 7 January, yet Dhruba's continued to post...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-04-01, 18:44
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Chris Douglas wrote: If it takes months, it is a failure. It should take weeks, if that. Thus far the changes suggested for a 1.0 branch are: - de-deprecate "classic...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-04-01, 17:50
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Chris K Wensel wrote: Yes. I too am +1 on removing deprecations in stable, public APIs in a 1.0 release. Code that uses only public 1.0 APIs and compiles without &nbs...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-04-01, 17:18
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Konstantin Shvachko wrote: That could be done too. Tom's volunteered to drive a release from trunk in a few weeks. Owen's volunteered to drive another release from tr...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-03-31, 21:19
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release process - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Allen Wittenauer wrote: Right. I'm proposing we make a 1.0 release that tries to match what folks are actually using in production and clarifies what APIs may be reli...
|
|
|
Author: Doug Cutting,
2010-03-31, 16:06
|
|
|
|
