| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 121 to 130 from
510 (0.169s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: Re: review request: HBASE-7403 Online Merge - HBase - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Chunhui Shen wrote: "sideline" them so they can data can be restored via a bulk load. http://hbase.apache.org/book/apbs04.html // Jo...
|
|
|
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-19, 19:05
|
|
|
Re: Performances Tests - HBase - [mail # dev]
|
|
...What is the y axis's unit? seconds or operations per second etc? (nit: would be nice to have on the axis.. ) Based on the context, I believe it is ops/s. Jon. O...
|
|
|
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-19, 18:59
|
|
|
Re: HBase type support - HBase - [mail # user]
|
|
...+1. I really don't want to add typing specific information into hbase core seems quite reasonable to me. There are many many games that can be played to encode data and enforcing...
|
|
|
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-18, 23:54
|
|
|
[HBASE-5837] hbase shell deleteall to .META. allows insertion of malformed rowkey - HBase - [issue]
|
|
...When using the hbase shell to manipulate meta entries, one is allowed to 'delete' malformed rows (entries with less than 2 ascii 44 ',' chars). When this happens HBase servers may go d...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5837
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-05, 08:29
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94. - HBase - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I don't think it is a debate about feature vs bug fix -- I've been trying to make a general case about major feature backports. I agree that we are basically on the same page for the ...
|
|
|
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-02, 21:49
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94. - HBase - [mail # dev]
|
|
...To be clear, a key point is that unit testing is a required but not sufficient. I need anecdotes about system testing with at least some unexpected fault handling and stress. If ...
|
|
|
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-02, 16:26
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94. - HBase - [mail # dev]
|
|
...In general, I have a preference against backporting features for the reasons that Enis, Elliott, and Jean-Marc consider valid. To be clear, this preference doesn't mean I am -1 t...
|
|
|
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-02, 15:36
|
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94. - HBase - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I think we are basically agreeing -- my primary concern is bringing new features in vital paths introduces more risk, I'd rather not backport major new features unless we achieve a higher le...
|
|
|
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-01, 23:11
|
|
|
[DISCUSS] More new feature backports to 0.94. - HBase - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I was thinking more about HBASE-7360 (backport snapshots to 0.94) and also saw HBASE-7965 which suggests porting some major-ish features (table locks, online merge) in to the apache 0.94 lin...
|
|
|
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-03-01, 16:31
|
|
|
[HBASE-5892] [hbck] Refactor parallel WorkItem* to Futures. - HBase - [issue]
|
|
...This would convert WorkItem* logic (with low level notifies, and rough exception handling) into a more canonical Futures pattern.Currently there are two instances of this pattern (for ...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5892
Author: Jonathan Hsieh,
2013-02-28, 22:48
|
|
|
|
