| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 11 to 20 from
204 (0.159s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
[VOTE] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"s in that thread. Absent objection I will cou...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-22, 02:03
|
|
|
Re: [PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Ok, if no one complains I will phrase the vote to include +1's explicitly cast in the discussion thread. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-22, 02:01
|
|
|
Re: [PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...13/14 +1's. I think that constitutes consensus. Moving this to a VOTE thread. Please repeat your +1s :-) Cheers, On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-22, 01:57
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta - Hadoop - [mail # general]
|
|
...I've now started a separate discussion thread in common-dev@, titled "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote". If it achieves consensus, I'll put it to a vote to so ch...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-21, 21:13
|
|
|
[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Hi all, This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any committer can create a bra...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-21, 21:10
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I'm actually drafting such a proposal. Will open the discussion as a [PROPOSAL] in general@ On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-15, 23:56
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Roman, what is your model for how test results from Bigtop should feed back into Hadoop-2 development? With the understanding that (a) software does have bugs, and (b) you're not going to ge...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-15, 23:54
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...achievable Seems to me common-dev is the appropriate ML, and Arun has invited Jiras to include. Open a Jira with your suggested list, and we carry on the discussion from there. D...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-15, 20:36
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...like +1 to that. Definitely an overriding concern for me. On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Sandy Ryza wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-15, 20:29
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta - Hadoop - [mail # dev]
|
|
...+1 (binding). I think it's important to maintain the release continuity, otherwise we could end up with the 0.20.2 / 0.20.200 problem all over again (parallel "stable" dev tracks witho...
|
|
|
Author: Matt Foley,
2013-05-15, 20:23
|
|
|
|
