| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 11 to 20 from
80 (0.536s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you refine your search...
|
|
[ACCUMULO-1069] InstanceOperations get/set/remove Property methods are ambiguous - Accumulo - [issue]
|
|
...InstanceOperations contains several methods for property manipulation that are ambiguous. The current API has setProperty and removeProperty methods, but two getters: getSystemConfigur...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1069
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-14, 20:33
|
|
|
[ACCUMULO-1067] InstanceOperations.setProperty / getSystemConfiguration inconsistent state - Accumulo - [issue]
|
|
...Performing an InstanceOperations.setProperty followed by an InstanceOperations.getSystemConfiguration can show that the property set wasn't actually set. This is most likely due to the fact ...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1067
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-14, 20:27
|
|
|
Re: MiniAccumulo or InstanceOperations or me? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I agree with the javadoc comment. I could even pony up to supplying a patch for that. Also, the setProperty and removeProperty method names are somewhat ambiguous. Since there are two ...
|
|
|
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-14, 20:20
|
|
|
Re: MiniAccumulo or InstanceOperations or me? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...It's in Clojure, so I'm not sure it would. I can work up a test case in Java tomorrow. Really want to know if I can set any random string as a property with the InstanceOperations class. &nb...
|
|
|
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-13, 02:22
|
|
|
MiniAccumulo or InstanceOperations or me? - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I'm not sure if this is a MiniAccumulo or an InstanceOperations or a me problem. If I do a InstanceOperations.setProperty followed by a getSiteConfiguration, my property isn't there. Does it...
|
|
|
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-13, 02:10
|
|
|
Re: MapReduceExample When Executed Displays Usage And Error Message - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I think having MiniAccumuloCluster.start() block until all the services are up is a good thing. I've been seeing somewhat unpredictable behavior also, and this could avoid a lot of questions...
|
|
|
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-11, 17:35
|
|
|
Re: Thrift Object in public API - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Just checked, it's still in there. On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Jim Klucar wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-10, 02:14
|
|
|
Re: MapReduceExample When Executed Displays Usage And Error Message - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I wonder if it is just because you're starting and stopping so quickly. I know the Tserver processes take a second to come up, perhaps put a sleep in for a few seconds and see if that works....
|
|
|
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-10, 01:45
|
|
|
Re: Thrift Object in public API - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...ok. I just saw the discussion on her from a week or so ago. I probably have an old pull. On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:14 PM, John Vines wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-09, 22:18
|
|
|
Thrift Object in public API - Accumulo - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I thought that in general, the thrift objects weren't to be used in the public API. The SecurityOptions.createUser method has a version that accepts a org.apache.accumulo.core.security...
|
|
|
Author: Jim Klucar,
2013-02-09, 22:12
|
|
|
|